NAME:
Michael C.
|
Foot to navel: 107cm
|
Navel to top of head:
64 cm
|
Ratio: 107/64 = 1.67
|
Average:
1.80 |
Navel to chin: 44cm
|
Chin to top of head: 18cm
|
Ratio: 44/18 = 2.44
|
||
Knee to navel: 57cm
|
Foot to knee: 51 cm
|
Ratio: 57/44 = 1.30
|
||
NAME:
Jesus H.
|
Foot to navel: 111cm
|
Navel to top of head: 56cm
|
Ratio: 111/56 = 1.98
|
Average:
1.77
|
Navel to chin: 44cm
|
Chin to top of head: 20cm
|
Ratio: 44/20 = 2.2
|
||
Knee to navel: 57 cm
|
Foot to knee: 51cm
|
Ratio: 57/51 = 1.12
|
||
NAME:
Austin V.
|
Foot to navel: 94cm
|
Navel to top of head: 63cm
|
Ratio: 94/63 = 1.49
|
Average:
1.66
|
Navel to chin: 45cm
|
Chin to top of head: 18cm
|
Ratio: 45/18 = 2.5
|
||
Knee to navel: 51cm
|
Foot to knee: 51cm
|
Ratio: 51/51 = 1
|
||
NAME:
Leslie N.
|
Foot to navel: 97cm
|
Navel to top of head: 62cm
|
Ratio: 97/62 = 1.56
|
Average:
1.70
|
Navel to chin: 46cm
|
Chin to top of head: 19cm
|
Ratio: 46/19 = 2.42
|
||
Knee to navel: 51cm
|
Foot to knee: 45cm
|
Ratio: 51/45 = 1.13
|
||
NAME:
Vanessa C.
|
Foot to navel: 99cm
|
Navel to top of head: 64cm
|
Ratio: 99/64 = 1.55
|
Average:
1.62
|
Navel to chin: 46cm
|
Chin to top of head: 21cm
|
Ratio: 46/21 = 2.19
|
||
Knee to navel: 55cm
|
Foot to knee: 49cm
|
Ratio: 55/49 = 1.12
|
In this activity, the golden ratio was used as a standard to see who is the "most beautiful" according to various measurements. Vanessa C. had an average that is closest to the golden ratio of 1.618 so she won the competition out of the 5 people that were measured.
The Fibonacci golden ratio for beauty is, in my humble opinion, a bunch of baloney. This ratio HEAVILY discriminates against those who were graced with more height than others. I am proud of my 6'2 height, but apparently Fibonacci didn't take too well against taller people, probably because he was some sort of midget. In addition, the only way to ace the second section is to have a face as long as a horse's or a ridiculously small torso. I cannot recall if there was a time when horse faces were deemed "beautiful" but I do know that in today's world, this would be deemed unfavorable. Which is why I must call this ratio a hoax and an embarrassment for REAL mathematicians that made REAL accomplishments. Thank you.